[POC] - Move PSL1GHT net code to newlib #2
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Closing for now, as I don't think I have a good enough understanding of ps3 newlib configurations atm for this to be relevant |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In order to address ps3dev/PSL1GHT#67, one of the items was to remove net code from PSL1GHT and add it to the ps3 newlib.
This in theory would do just that. This implementation is taken from the libnet sprx which uses known supported vsh net functions documented here https://www.psdevwiki.com/ps3/VSH_Exports. The idea would be to leave the VSH exports over in PSL1GHT (for now) with a net/net.h exposing the export functions from the netlib sprx until the NID database can be hooked up to.
I'm also not too familiar with newlib and how it's configured / integrated with PSL1GHT currently, so any info / feedback there would be good too.
Thanks for looking!